Continuous detection assurance
SIEMs are sold on what they collect, never on what they can actually detect. Dectyl is the verification layer that closes that gap.
Believed coverage vs. verified coverage
Most of your defenses are configured, not verified. Dectyl proves what would actually fire against the threats aimed at you, from your own telemetry, and shows you exactly how to close it.
When your board asks if you're covered
Dectyl models the threats actually targeting you and gives you a verified readiness score for each, plus the three fixes that move it most, in days not a quarter.
Every layer of your stack grades its own homework. The SIEM reports on its rules, the pipeline reports on its routing, the platform reports on itself. Dectyl is the layer that verifies instead: read-only, from outside the stack it grades. It tells you which of your security investments are working for you.
Per-threat readiness from four pillars: coverage · telemetry · validation · reliability. Representative demo tenant.
Connected read-only in days. The few fixes that matter in week one. Board-ready proof in a month. Sharper every month it runs.
Connect read-only. No agents, no simulations. See which of your detections can actually fire, and the first dollar figure: ingest spend feeding rules that never can. A real number, not a config audit.
A ranked, owned action list, not a backlog of everything. Each fix priced by readiness lift per hour of effort. AI drafts the runbook; your team approves.
Every fix re-tested, every lift verified. A readiness report your CISO puts on a board slide, in language the audit committee reads.
Accurate from day one, and it compounds. Every validated mapping sharpens its scoring and prioritization. Drift caught the day it happens.
Not "is this rule configured?" but "can it actually fire against the threats that matter?" One number per threat, scored the same way every day.
A technique isn't covered or uncovered. It has many procedures, and a rule only covers some. Dectyl shows how many of each technique's procedures a detection can actually fire on.
We don't hand you a coverage score. We hand your team the few fixes that move risk most this week, ordered by lift per unit of effort, and prove each one landed. Managed execution, not another posture report.
The AI attack surface (prompt injection, tool abuse, agent lateral movement) deserves the same can-fire verification as the rest of your stack. Dectyl extends the same readiness engine to it, scored against MITRE ATLAS. One loop across SIEM and AI, not a separate product to buy.
Adversarial instructions smuggled through user input or retrieved content that hijack an agent's behavior.
ATLAS · AML.T0051An agent coerced into invoking its own tools (code exec, file, or API calls) for the attacker's ends.
ATLAS · AML.T0053One compromised agent pivoting across connected agents, tools, and identities inside the org.
ATLAS · AML.T0048Backdoored weights, poisoned fine-tunes, or tampered model artifacts entering production.
ATLAS · AML.T0010Sensitive data drained through model outputs, context windows, or agent tool channels.
ATLAS · AML.T0024AI readiness scored on the same can-fire basis as the rest of your stack, not a separate product.
Ask the question a board actually asks, "what's our coverage against a worm that moves laterally?" and the AI decomposes it into the kill-chain it would have to traverse.
Every step scored on detections that actually fire, so the gap that gets you surfaces first. Illustrative.
Detections drift: a log source changes format, a rule starts flapping, telemetry stops. Dectyl watches continuously and attributes every change to a cause, so nothing slips by unnoticed.
Import a resolved incident and Dectyl reconstructs the attack path, shows where your detections would fire against it today, and turns any gaps into tracked, verified fixes.
The same engine reasons across every surface. Deterministic where you need trust (your rules are parsed, not guessed) and AI everywhere it amplifies your team's judgment.
See the full data-flow architecture: what crosses the boundary and what never does →
Posture, deltas, KEV exposure and recommended actions. Written for the audit committee, not the SOC. Shipped monthly, current always.
Readiness improved 6 points this month, led by ransomware-impact coverage. All nine KEV-listed techniques are now closed and verified; remaining gaps are queued by lift per effort for this sprint.
The status quo measures coverage once and assumes it holds. Dectyl measures readiness continuously and proves it.
We connect read-only and deliver the first verdict: which detections can fire, which structurally can't, which log sources feed nothing, and what that ingest costs. One report, no commitment. Your data never leaves your environment.
The full loop: ranked action queue, verified fixes, drift monitoring, monthly board reporting, and founding pricing locked for two years. For teams ready to run readiness as a program, not a snapshot.